知乎 on MSN
Claude Code、Cursor、TRAE,究竟谁最强?
先回答问题:日常写代码我用Cursor,复杂重构用Claude Code,TRAE试了一阵后放弃了。不是TRAE不好,是我懒得换。 很多人把这三个放一起比,其实不太对。Cursor和TRAE是一类,都是IDE,写代码的时候在旁边给你补全、回答问题。Claude Code是另一类,它是个Agent,你给它任务它自己去干,干完了叫你。
2025年末,Anthropic旗下Claude Code迎来重大社区生态突破:一款名为“Claude Code Workflow Studio”的VSCode扩展工具迅速走红。该工具通过直观的拖拽式画布界面,让用户无需编写复杂提示或终端命令,即可构建和执行 高级 AI自动化工作流。这标志着Claude Code从纯命令行工具向可视化、无代码方向的演进,极大降低了非专业开发者的使用门槛。
What if you could supercharge your coding environment with a tool that seamlessly integrates into your favorite platforms? Enter Claude Code—a powerful plugin designed to streamline workflows and ...
AI编程工具正在走向两极:一种是“人主导、AI辅助”的IDE范式,一种是“AI主导、人监督”的代理范式。本文以Cursor与Claude Code为样本,系统拆解其底层机制、交互逻辑与使用场景,是一份关于“新编码范式”的战略观察与工具指南。 第一节:引言:“Vibe Coding ...
Claude Code consistently delivers the highest-quality, most production-ready code—especially for complex refactoring, tests, and multi-file edits. Gemini Code is strong for large projects, fast ...
Imagine you’re racing against a tight deadline, juggling complex codebases, and relying on an AI assistant to bridge the gap between inspiration and execution. Now, picture two contenders vying for ...
In the race to deploy generative AI for coding, the fastest tools are not winning enterprise deals. A new VentureBeat analysis, combining a comprehensive survey of 86 engineering teams with our own ...
人们一直讨论人工智能工具尚未证明其价值。但如果以收入来衡量,在软件工程领域,AI 工具确实带来了实实在在的回报。 由Anysphere 的 Cursor 和 Anthropic 的 Claude Code 等 AI 编程工具共同创造的收入已突破 31 亿美元。 据直接了解 Cognition 财务状况的人士 ...
AI-based coding tools won't be able to compete with the LLM giants. Observability is one possible way to differentiate the tools. Some startups will get acquired, others will go out of business.
一些您可能无法访问的结果已被隐去。
显示无法访问的结果